?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
30 January 2005 @ 02:30 pm
Deconstructing Peter -- Why Peter's Not Stupid or Inept  
Posted originally on http://www.fictionalley.org.

Peter has been unjustly labelled inept at wizardry by the fandom, and it's time someone spoke up on his behalf.

Peter is generally portrayed in fanfic (when he is portrayed at all, but that's a rant for another time) as being not only evil, but also stupid. Crabbe and Goyle look like veritable geniuses next to the blobby incompetence of Peter.

Yet this is fanon, not canon. Actually, Voldemort consistently trusts Peter to take care of him and to make potions restoring his health. Peter, mind you, not Snape.

And yet Snape is the canonical genius when it comes to potions.

So why would Voldemort use Peter as a maker of healing potions when--even in hiding--he could have potions made by Snape owled to him?

I'm guessing that Snape is the better at potions overall--but that Peter is the one who has a knack for healing. Snape doesn't. In Muggle terms, Snape is a chemist, but Peter is a physician.

I don't see Voldemort trusting his health or his life to an incompetent. He could surely terrify, torture or Imperio Peter into getting him into more able hands, if Peter's skill were inadequate to his needs. Voldemort is, after all, no respecter of persons.

"But," I can hear someone in the back protesting, "McGonagall said that Peter wasn't in the same class as James and Sirius, magically!"

I don't think he was.

I suspect that James and Sirius were naturals at magic--that they had brilliant, lightning-fast minds that grasped means and method light-years ahead of other students. Peter was slower to grasp things that they understood almost intuitively. He was a plodder, and plodders can be aggravating in classrooms, because they want to take their time, understand all the aspects of what they're doing, and get into the whys and the wherefores, if possible.

People tend to forget that slower doesn't mean less able. Some of the best thinkers in the world have been those who mulled over problems and concepts for years.

I think that the difference between James' and Sirius' magic and Peter's magic is illustrated by something that Gytha Ogg says about herself and Granny Weatherwax in Terry Pratchett's Discworld story, "The Sea and Little Fishes":

"I'm the one who's nat'rally talented. Us Oggs've got witchcraft in our blood. I never really had to sweat at it. Esme, now...she's got a bit, it's true, but it ain't a lot. She just makes it work harder'n hell."

So what kind of magic IS Peter good at?

In addition to Potions (which has the canonical Voldemort seal of approval), I suspect he's also good at Herbology. A lot of plants are used in potions, ointments and salves, which would also fit the image of Peter as someone with a knack for Healing.

And, of course, we know that Peter is excellent at Transfiguration.

A yowl arises from half the fandom. "He can't be THAT good at Transfiguration! He had to have help with the Animagus spell!"

Remus is the one who tells Harry that Peter had to have help--not Sirius. Remus would only know second-hand or third-hand whether Peter had to have help or not, because he didn't participate in the Animagus spellwork. James, Sirius and Peter did.

I can't see a fifteen-year-old Peter telling Remus something so potentially humiliating. There's no way now to confirm what James did or didn't say. And, as we've already witnessed, Sirius isn't the most objective witness on Peter's behalf.

However, even if Remus is right and Peter did need help, that does not take away from the fact that, at fifteen, Peter was one of the three youngest wizards ever to become an Animagus.

Full-grown, fully qualified, even highly gifted wizards have trouble casting the Animagus spell successfully. And not only is it difficult to the point of virtual impossibility, it's also dangerous. People get stuck between animal and human. People die.

And Peter, James and Sirius cast the spell successfully. At the age of fifteen. The three canonically youngest Animagi in all of magical history--roughly four thousand years, according to the Lexicon.

Let me repeat--the three youngest in four thousand YEARS.

Those three boys had to be extremely good wizards to accomplish something like that--Peter no less than James and Sirius.

So why do so many fans minimise Peter's intelligence and accomplishments?

Part of it, I fear, is due to Peter's appearance in the books. He is generally portrayed as sycophantic or grovelling, someone desperate to appease others stronger than himself. If he had been better at magic, the notion seems to run, he wouldn't have needed to appease anyone.

To be fair, we never do see Peter at his best in Rowling's writings. The one time that we see him as a boy, he is, like the rest of his crowd, laughing at Snape being tormented.

With all due respect, however, this doesn't make him a sycophant or a toady. It just makes him a fifteen-year-old boy hanging around with his friends. It's not uncommon for a person to behave differently in a group than he does on his own.

And the other times we see Peter (in human form, at least), he is generally in a state of terror--afraid of his former friends, afraid of the Death Eaters, afraid of Voldemort.

Peter's terror doesn't mean that he's brainless or helpless, however. After all, his abilities are part of the reason that Voldemort keeps him around (as well as being Exhibit A of how Voldemort and the Death Eaters can shatter a person). As a Death Eater, Peter has almost certainly learned how to kill--and, as a Healer (for he does treat and tend Voldemort), he would know anatomy.

Think about some of the possibilities. "Accio heart!" "Mobilicerebrum!"

Yes, Peter certainly has knowledge, training and power. What he doesn't have is confidence. Death Eater Peter has no faith in himself left--certainly none to toot his own horn. Those who knew him best are no longer inclined to remember his strengths. Voldemort, as much as he needs Peter--perhaps BECAUSE he needs Peter--clearly despises him. And most fans of the Potterverse are, sadly, disinclined to look beyond Peter's self-loathing and the contempt of his once and present allies. Consequently, Peter tends to be seen as if in a distorting mirror by those who are unaware that the distortion exists.
 
 
Current Mood: curiouscurious
 
 
 
Magpie: Hmmmm..sistermagpie on January 30th, 2005 08:54 pm (UTC)
The other thing is that in canon "intelligence" is defined in sort of odd ways. People are considered geniuses for being good at spellwork when spells have very little to do with intelligence and everything to do with power or natural skill. It may be difficult to cast a Patronus, but it doesn't draw on intelligence, does it?

So really a lot of skills are just held in higher regard than others. Despite everybody thinking Peter an idiot, Peter completely pulls one over on his three "smarter" friends. He's able to conceal his allegiances. He keeps himself alive. Not only did he take out Order members, he's one of the more effective DEs as well.

So really I think part of the reason Peter can't be honestly assessed in canon is whatever areas he does excel in are not held in high regard. Few characters in canon are going to express admiration for being able to screw over your friends--they see the cowardice involved, but not the skill at deception, nor possibly the skill at using other's strengths against them.
Sev1970: Harry and Hermionesev1970 on January 30th, 2005 11:17 pm (UTC)
I can accept some of your observations regarding Peter - yes, he has more abilities than people give him credit for, and he has to have some cunning ability to be able to keep his true allegiances from the three other Marauders.

I disagree however with your assessment of the reason Voldemort is using Peter for his potions. It is not, in my opinion, because he is the one who can do it best, or even adequately. He is making the potion, and prepares what Voldemort needs, because he is the only one who can. Voldemort is weak at that time and can barely do anything, so he has to take what he can get. Bellatrix and her husband are in Azkaban, and Crouch is at Hogwarts posing as Moody in book four when Peter is having to help Voldemort stay alive. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I do not think we hear about Peter at all in Book five, once Voldemort is back at full strength. I think that is what will be interestisng - to see where Peter stands now in Voldemort's eyes. Of course many of the Death Eaters are now back in Azkaban, but Bellatrix is now with Voldemort again.
(Anonymous) on January 31st, 2005 04:27 am (UTC)
I agree Peter can't be the idiot fanfic authors love to make him out as (although your take on Healer Peter was something I never thought of before). I've tended to go by Red Hen's theory that Peter is manipulative behind the scenes sort of guy and I've always liked After-the-Rain's portrait's of Peter. I hope JKR shows us more of him because his betrayal is not merely a great story plot point. I want to see Peter the mastermind, Peter the self-loathing, Peter the lonely, Peter anything but the bumbling nitwit or the conveniently left out.
Lilito: choclatlilito on February 15th, 2005 09:29 pm (UTC)
Also consider that this is fandom, and most of the writers who put Peter in their stories aren't the most incredible writers in the world (though many of them are quite spectacular). Making Peter a stupid blubbering follower is an easy way out for an inexperienced writer. I believe that the Peter in canon and those few stories that have him competent and respected in the MWPP era (for example) is a very very complex character. It's hard to wrap ones mind around someone who is smart and obviously couragous (sorted in Gryffindor) but takes the cowardly path. He's very intriguing and complex and takes a lot of figuring out (why, for example, he decides to betray his friends, emotionally or otherwise).

This doesn't give the authors an excuse to write him so one-dimensionally, but its an explaination. We can still tsk at them. (Tsk.) :)
Jaximadra_blue on February 23rd, 2005 06:17 pm (UTC)
*gives you a standing ovation*

I, too, have been screaming things like this for months now. I have have so much love you and this essay. Truly.